This is my response to the tragedy involving the Cruise Ship - Costa Concordia, over 4000 lives at the risk, and the Captain, Francesco Schettino.
The article is at :                        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16563562
" Leeme'
 see here: The Captain, Francesco Schettino was originally an Officer in
 charge of security in 2002. In 2006 he became a Captain after 
undergoing "....a continuous programme of training.....". (he passed all 
the required checks), and this was the first night of the cruise. Now, 
from my understanding - these ships are guided by computer along a 
pre-designated course, the waters have already been
 accurately charted and the ship must remain within its designated 
cruise path - that has already been deemed safe by surveys, satellite 
and previous cruises. For him to say - "the rocks should not have been 
there"- is freakin' ridiculous. (Do rocks move ?). This tragedy could 
have been avoided, had he been a REAL Captain and undergone years of 
meticulous training and practice. NO. This is the result of "Training 
and Assessment" - because he met the required 'competencies' in his class
 attendance for "Cruise Ship Captain 101". ! He is trying to cover his 
own arse, when in fact he should be consulting his lawyer and SUING his 
employer for incompetency in allowing an 'incompetent' person to have 
the responsibility for over 4000 lives. Your local Busdriver would do 
better than this incompetent prick. He should be tied to a chair on a 
long rope and repeatedly dunked in the ocean until he 
drowns.............and the shareholders of this business should sell 
immediately and force the company into bankruptcy. But -I gotta' laugh 
because Schettino at this moment is really Schetting Himself."
Monday, January 16, 2012
Sunday, January 8, 2012
Marilyn Monroe
I posted this comment in relation to an article titled : "Unsexing Marilyn" at this address
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jan/05/unsexing-marilyn/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nybooks+%28The+New+York+Review+of+Books%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher
                
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jan/05/unsexing-marilyn/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nybooks+%28The+New+York+Review+of+Books%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher
        "It's nonsense that MM is always portrayed as "she couldn't act".
 Motion Pictures are for actors. MM was too natural to be ordered to 
act. So many takes were required because the director always required 
her to 'act'. She lived with the constant frustration of not being  
portrayed as a  'serious' actress. She was very well read and trained, 
but she was so genuinely 'sexy' that the camera had difficulty catching 
the true moments of her act. I agree that in "Some Like it Hot" and "The
 Seven Year Itch" she simply oozed sex and that was part of the problem ,
 her co-stars could not match/compete with the aura she projected. "The 
Misfits" was truly her greatest moment in cinema. Her portrayal is so 
feminine and alluring that her famous co-stars become insignificant to 
the story. She takes over the complete film, she oozes womanhood and 
emotion, making everyone else in the film (except the horses) seem so 
wooden and devoid of feeling. A great persona, just too great to be 
captured by the humble camera."      
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

 
